To this objection, the atheist may respond in the form of a question: It is therefore impossible for us to know, with any degree of certainty, whether any given instance of suffering is unjustified, or whether it serves some greater purpose.
The all-lovingness of God can also be doubted with the paragraph above. Have you ever said Yes to a single joy. Was not a single one of those deaths pointless, given the others. In mainstream theology, Satan is not omnipotent, while God is.
Finally, there is another issue in this. Does the existence of moral evil lead to the conclusion that there is no deity at all.
God could accomplish this by making moral actions especially pleasurable, or evil action and suffering impossible by allowing free will but not allowing the ability to enact evil or impose suffering.
Rowe 's example of natural evil: The Argument from Evil 1 If God exists then he is omniscient, omnipotent and perfectly good. Jeremiah even said the Jews were exiled to allow the land to observe the sabbaths for 70 years to make up for their collective failure to keep the sabbaths.
It only shows that it could be worse, there could be no resulting good. First there is the actual conception and birth of the child, which can be compared to the physical creation of man.
Unfortunately, this rarely panned out. If you have the real existence of evil and no God, since evil disproves God then how can you have an objective human-mind independent moral law.
The wicked often flourished, became rich and lived long, happy lives while the virtuous and poor often fell sick and were cut short from the blessings of life.
Augustine, God created man without sin and placed him in a paradise free of sin. If such a God existed, though, then he actually would prevent all suffering.
Paul, "We know that in everything God works for good with those who love him" Rom. God, Freedom, and Evil. Does the Existence of Moral Evil Disprove the Existence of God? (Podcast) jwallace August 23, Podcasts 2, Views. In this blast from the past, J.
Warner Wallace examines another aspect of the classic “Problem of Evil”. Why would an all-loving and all-powerful God allow people to commit horrific crimes?
Doesn’t He have the power to. This solves the logical problem of evil, but does not solve the evidential problem of evil. While a god of this nature might exist, it must be weaker than all of the suffering present in the universe, as it is clearly unable to stop it.
According to the logical problem it is impossible for God and evil to co-exist. If God exists, then evil cannot exist. If evil exists then God cannot exist.
Since evil exists, it follows that God does not exist. The theist does not have to answer why God allows evil; they need only to show that God and evil are not incompatible. The problem with this argument is that there is no inconsistency between God’s.
An introduction to the problem of evil, the argument that the existence of evil in the world is proof that God does not exist. Philosophy of Religion thesanfranista.com Rowe calls this the “evidential argument from evil,” because, rather than the mere presence of evil making it impossible that God exists (i.e., the logical argument from evil), the evidence of large amounts of evil makes it unlikely God exists.
Rowe’s version of the problem of evil proceeds as follows: P1. Nov 16, · J. Warner Wallace, author of God’s Crime Scene, discusses the nature of evil and free agency.
Does the existence of moral evil disprove the existence of God or is evil .Does teh problem of evil disprove